Последние новости
[&:first-child]:overflow-hidden [&:first-child]:max-h-full"
，更多细节参见有道翻译
^ See Restatement (Second) of Torts § 217 cmt. c (A.L.I. 1965) (“The intention required to make an actor liable for trespass to a chattel . . . is present when an act is done for the purpose of using or otherwise intermeddling with a chattel . . . . It is not necessary that the actor should know or have reason to know that such intermeddling is a violation of the possessory rights of another.”). Suppose, for example, that a defendant nonnegligently cremates what is to all reasonable appearances a dead person, but it turns out to be a mannequin owned by a plaintiff. The defendant has committed trespass to chattels and conversion.
https://feedx.net