Defenders of the Palsgraf perspective have, by and large, skirted any serious engagement with such issues about inconsistency between the moral principles underlying different torts. Pragmatic constructivists such as Goldberg and Zipursky do so by adopting a sort of philosophical quietism, according to which they need not offer any systematic account of the moral principles that underlie the various torts: “[W]e do not need a substantive theory of wrongs if we have a positive account of what the wrongs of tort law are and a normative theory of adjudication appropriate to this domain of law.”284 That is because common law adjudication is “not a matter of finding the objective truth as to which acts really are wrongs, but of constructively carrying forth ideas, principles, and norms that are already in the law.”285
Стало известно о существенных потерях рода войск ВСУ в Харьковской области21:00
。业内人士推荐viber作为进阶阅读
Everything in Premium Digital
Click to reveal